tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7603499.post8196978950028296055..comments2023-11-30T03:44:34.585-05:00Comments on Opinions Nobody Asked For: Show This Guy The MoneyJeffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11683622475941901572noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7603499.post-48000668055789024902007-09-29T00:39:00.000-04:002007-09-29T00:39:00.000-04:00If it's not probable cause to search the car, it's...If it's not probable cause to search the car, it's certainly suspicious. I can't say offhand what other indicia there might have been to make the cop think there was crime and/or contraband.<BR/><BR/>Speaking of suspicious, who the fuck carries around $276,640 in cash? I'm not saying this justifies the cops keeping the guy's money and shifting the burden of proof. But it seriously gives me pause. I might be inclined to let the cops hold the money while they investigate....but if they can't find anything soon, give it back to him.<BR/><BR/>Or I might not. I'd have to think about it for a second.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15344649128973165027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7603499.post-73994971727813150852007-09-26T10:03:00.000-04:002007-09-26T10:03:00.000-04:00My guess on the search is probably that the office...My guess on the search is probably that the officer asked the guy if he could search his car, and the guy said sure. Doesn't sound like he had anything to hide. Granted I've never walked out of a casino with a whole ton of money, but I've also never gotten a receipt for the money I did earn, so I'm inclined to believe the guy. After all, he's Canadian.<BR/><BR/>As for taking the money, yeah, what the hell? The burden of proof should always be on those who claim guilt, not those who profess innocence. Of course, we all know that's not really how America works anymore. Damn liberal media.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06383789548221247888noreply@blogger.com